Is O'Reilly really ignoring Obama's numerous UN-patriotic attacks against our Constitution? Is O'Reilly really, or facetiously, trying to find something redeeming about Obama, as Obama's disastrous presidency splutters into the darker annals of U.S. history?
YOU and I KNOW that Obama's unconstitutional actions do NOT fit the definition of patriotism. Is it possible (hopefully) that Bill O'Reilly was really trying to subtly challenge U.S. citizens to more carefully examine the gravity of Obama's undermining attacks against our foundational Documents, Principles, and our way of life, that voters would avoid electing a political Obama clone, or worse, in the coming election?
Most people KNOW a REAL patriot by the behavior and words of the citizen in question, in harmony with the dictionary definition of "patriot". The dictionary definition states exactly what normal people say, that a patriot LOVES, SUPPORTS, AND FIGHTS FOR that nation and FOR its AUTHORITY and its INTERESTS. Normal people understand that patriots do NOT attack the Constitution, Bill of Rights, and other fundamental Documents and Principles of their nation.
And I quote (copied from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary website):
noun pa·tri·ot \ˈpā-trē-ət, -ˌät, chiefly British ˈpa-trē-ət\
Simple Definition of patriot
- : a person who loves and strongly supports or fights for his or her country
Full Definition of patriot
- : one who loves his or her country and supports its authority and interests